Thursday, September 24, 2009
Theater Experiments
Is Hollywood A giant stage for experiments on the public that allows the "Monitor" to stage scenarios and controversies to just watch the public reactions? To better understand the psyche of the society in a whole and to better understand the outcome of say cataclysmic events? If a apocalyptic movie premiers where in the end all of humanity is lost, and the movie does horrible in theaters and critics have nothings but rude limericks about the out come, wouldn't it be safe to say that, that kind of scenario does not fit into the average persons mind frame as being a true possibility? Or would it be fitting to say that if it scares us or seems like there's no "happy way out" that we will simply perceive it as not even being a possibility?
Is it possible that to discredit the existence of aliens or CIA operatives or distant life on other planets, even paranormal phenomena a wave of movies could be released with those types of stories in them to help give people a way out of a conversation they cannot explain? Oh you've just watched to many Sci-Fi flicks or you've just heard to many ghost stories, Your PARANOID. Well you know what, Your damn right I'm paranoid. To say that you know the meaning of everything and that what ever doesn't make since to you just simply cannot be true is absurd and only ignorant people will try to say they know the real way everything is. For in this world anything is a possible and every Idea has to get its start from something, weather its explainable or not I would never say anything is impossible.
So the next time you watch a movie that seems to have a impossible outcome or series of events that seem absolutely unimaginable stop and compare it to some other impossible things that you do believe in like maybe stories from the bible or stories you've heard from relatives that you want to believe in so bad you can feel that they are true, where do you draw the lines in what is and isn't real? How can you draw those lines when you have not taken the time to study the actual probability of such things really happening?
Saturday, August 29, 2009
Tranformation not termination
Friday, August 28, 2009
Great Things to Read
Thursday, August 27, 2009
Sugar in space
According to Science@NASA
Scientist have discovered Glycolalehyde, A molecular cousin to table sugar, in an interstellar molecular cloud.
The prospects for life in the Universe just got sweeter, with the first discovery of a simple sugar molecule in space. The discovery of glycolaldehyde in a giant cloud of gas and dust near the center of our own Milky Way Galaxy was made by scientists using the National Science Foundation’s 12 Meter Telescope, a radio telescope on Kitt Peak, Arizona.
“The discovery of this sugar molecule in a cloud from which new stars are forming means it is increasingly likely that the chemical precursors to life are formed in such clouds long before planets develop around the stars,” said Jan M. Hollis of the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD.
“This discovery may be an important key to understanding the formation of life on the early Earth,” agreed Philip Jewell of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO). Conditions in interstellar clouds may, in some cases, mimic the conditions on the early Earth, so studying the chemistry of interstellar clouds may help scientists understand how bio-molecules formed early in our planet’s history. In addition, some scientists have suggested that Earth could have been “seeded” with complex molecules by passing comets, made of material from the interstellar cloud that condensed to form the Solar System.
Glycolaldehyde, an 8-atom molecule composed of carbon, oxygen and hydrogen, can combine with other molecules to form the more-complex sugars Ribose and Glucose. Ribose is a building block of nucleic acids such as RNA and DNA, which carry the genetic code of living organisms. Glucose is the sugar found in fruits. Glycolaldehyde contains exactly the same atoms, though in a different molecular structure, as methyl formate and acetic acid, both of which were detected previously in interstellar clouds. Glycolaldehyde is a simpler molecular cousin to table sugar.
Glycolaldehyde, the simplest sugar, compared to more complex sugar forms that occur naturally (i.e., the D-sugars). Note that the structure of glycolaldehyde is contained in both Ribose and Glucose. Ribose sugars make up the backbone of the ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecule which is involved in protein synthesis in living cells. Glucose, the most common sugar, occurs in plant saps and fruits. Credit: NRAO.
The sugar molecule was detected in a large cloud of gas and dust some 26,000 light-years away, near the center of our Galaxy. Such clouds, often many light-years across, are the material from which new stars are formed. Though very rarefied by Earth standards, these interstellar clouds are the sites of complex chemical reactions that occur over hundreds of thousands or millions of years. So far, about 120 different molecules have been discovered in these clouds. Most of these molecules contain a small number of atoms, and only a few molecules with eight or more atoms have been found in interstellar clouds.
“Finding glycolaldehyde in one of these interstellar clouds means that such molecules can be formed even in very rarefied conditions,” added Hollis.
“We hope this discovery inspires renewed efforts to find even more kinds of molecules, so that, with a better idea of the total picture, we may be able to deduce the details of the prebiotic chemistry taking place in interstellar clouds,” Hollis said.
I believe that these discoveries help feed primordial soup theory, RNA theories, evolutionary biology theories of how life started.
Garbage Island
Saturday, April 18, 2009
9/11
Now You can argue over all of these details all you want but there are several key things you cant deny like that the steel used for the steel beams couldn't even be melted at the temperature that jet fuel burns at, especially upon a impact when most the fuel would have burned up upon impact. and the molten metal cuts in the base of the support beams. Or most importantly that the buildings both feel at free fall speed, and the whole damn thing looked like a planned demolition. Along with the twin towers and building 7 the pentagon and the plane in the field there are a lot of unanswered questions that could easily be answered through things like security camera footage from surrounding hotels and buildings that would prove once and for all what happened but the government refuses to release them.
I think if they weren't guilty they wouldn't have had to confiscate them to began with. How can we turn our heads on those that where hurt by our own actions. How can we just forget the Truth! Everyone that day saw some unexplainable shit that we need to resolve. Every damn news broadcast at the time shooting footage of the towers even admitted that it looked like a controlled demolition. I was home from work that day watching it with my own two eyes along with 90% of the world and I know I'm not the only one to have noticed these things. Anyone that witnessed these horrific event in person or on tv or what ever, and doesn't stand up for finding out the truth of what happened is just as guilty as those that where in charge.